[Chilli] Wifi security

sherca sherca at gmail.com
Thu Jan 3 13:54:15 UTC 2013


Thank you for your answer. This is what I meant, coova-chilli (https
landing page) and freeradius are not enough to prevent attacks like
firesheep, right ?

Indeed one can use wpa2 entreprise, but the question is : do we have to ?


2013/1/3 EasyHorpak.com <info at easyhorpak.com>

>  On 03/01/2556 14:17, sherca wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
>  I was wondering if the use of Coova Chilli (or any captive portal for
> that matter) was any help for security issues like the use of Firesheep.
>
>  I was believing the use of the captive portal would allow us to not use
> secured connection ( WEP or WPA), thus allowing the user to connect to the
> router without login/password exchange at that level (that is before the
> captive portal).
>
>  Thanks !
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Chilli mailing listChilli at coova.orghttp://lists.coova.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/chilli
>
>  you can use wpa2 enterpise with coovachilli +freeradius
>
> _______________________________________________
> Chilli mailing list
> Chilli at coova.org
> http://lists.coova.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/chilli
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.coova.org/pipermail/chilli/attachments/20130103/d3484d2e/attachment.html>


More information about the Chilli mailing list