/32 subnet
Thomas Liske
liske at ibh.de
Wed Feb 4 10:25:26 UTC 2009
Hi,
On Wed, 4 Feb 2009, Outback Dingo wrote:
> hrmm honestly, isnt this the same as AP separation on the AP itself?? using
> say
nope, AP client seperation is layer 2, this will give you some more
protection. My layer 3 approach wouldn't prevent bad guys to change their
subnet mask and send some malicious UDP pakets. But TCP connection
wouldn't work, since the three-way-handshake would be blocked.
And you need an AP which support client separation. Whats
about wired hotspots?
Regards,
Thomas
More information about the Chilli
mailing list