[Chilli] Wifi security
timwhite88 at gmail.com
Fri Jan 4 01:07:26 UTC 2013
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 12:24 AM, sherca <sherca at gmail.com> wrote:
> Thank you for your answer. This is what I meant, coova-chilli (https
> landing page) and freeradius are not enough to prevent attacks like
> firesheep, right ?
> Indeed one can use wpa2 entreprise, but the question is : do we have to ?
Firesheep generally uses the fact the the Wifi clients can see each others
traffic. WPA(2) plus client isolation on the wireless access point are 2
things to do to help prevent it. Coova Chilli has no part in preventing
firesheep as it occurs before firesheep.
Should you use something like WPA2? Probably to prevent firesheep. Or
introduce your clients to HTTPS everywhere or if using wireless without any
encryption, then VPN's.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Chilli