Coova vs Xwrt
Aykut Demirkol
aykut.demirkol at gmail.com
Sun Jan 20 09:28:34 UTC 2008
Thanks David.
What's the plan in kamikaze version of Coova, to give a lot feature as
Xwrt? or will try to be simple and stable again?
Respectfully,
AB
wlan at mac.com wrote:
> The web interface in CoovaAP and Xwrt both stem from the same source -
> the original whiterussian webif. The Xwrt project started as the
> kamikaze port of this webif and added _a lot_ of features. Xwrt tries
> to make as many things possible configurable, whereas CoovaAP tries to
> keep the interface as simple as possible. Xwrt tends to map all
> possible options for an app into the webif, so it assumes the user
> knows what they are doing. CoovaAP tries to hide the complexity of
> applications by keeping the interface minimal.
>
> CoovaAP is probably more "stable" solely because it has fewer options
> and supports fewer platforms. Of course, I'm speaking only of the web
> interfaces and not in terms of whiterussian vs. kamikaze. When it
> comes to moving CoovaAP to kamikaze, I'm working on a completely
> different kind of web interface, as described here:
>
> http://coova.org/wordpress/index.php/2007/05/03/embedded-web-20/
>
> David
>
> On Jan 20, 2008, at 2:19 AM, Ahmet wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>> Here is a new bee question:
>> Can we compare coova and xwrt in terms of practicality, stability, or
>> else..
>>
>> Can you share your opinions and knowledge with me.
>>
>> Respectfully,
>>
>> AB
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: cap-unsubscribe at coova.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: cap-help at coova.org
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: cap-unsubscribe at coova.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: cap-help at coova.org
>
>
More information about the Cap
mailing list